Sep 2, 2025
Written By Elizabeth Cifers
In retina practices, documentation serves as more than just a record; it is the foundation for compliant billing, clean claims, and appropriate payments, not to mention it is a legal document. Every office visit, test, and procedure billed must be well-supported in the chart. This is particularly true when utilizing modifiers. Modifiers are powerful tools that enhance clarity, but they can also pose significant risks if misused. When documentation fails to support the use of a modifier, it opens the door to denied claims, delayed payments, and unwanted attention from payers.
Modifiers provide payers with additional details and context for the code, such as whether the service was performed on the same eye or the fellow eye, was distinct from another procedure, or was performed during the post-op period for a related or unrelated reason. In retina practices, these scenarios frequently occur. To prevent confusion or denial, it’s crucial that the medical record clearly explains the clinical reasoning for each billed service.
These aren’t just codes to tack on for payment. They must reflect a clinical reality, and that reality needs to be documented clearly in the medical record. If there’s no note explaining why an office visit was separately billable on the day of a procedure, or no justification for why a procedure was distinct from another, the modifier shouldn’t be used.
Using a modifier without proper documentation can trigger several problems:
• Recoupments: Even if the claim is initially paid, a post-pay audit may result in money being taken back if the documentation doesn’t support the modifier used.
• Increased Audit Risk: Repeated unsupported modifier use can raise red flags with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. Patterns of modifier misuse often lead to more in-depth audits or prepayment reviews.
• Compliance Concerns: The OIG has consistently identified modifier misuse as a source of improper payments. Even unintentional misuse can lead to accusations of waste or abuse against a practice.
In retina, where office visits and procedures are frequent and often performed on the same day, the temptation to default to specific modifiers is real. However, payers are increasingly sophisticated, and modifiers are among the first things they look for when reviewing claims.
The good news? These risks are avoidable. Most issues related to modifiers stem from inconsistent or insufficient documentation, or there may be a misunderstanding of what the modifier means and how it should be used. This indicates that improvement is well within reach.
Begin by educating physicians, scribes, and billing staff on when modifiers are appropriate and what documentation is required. For example:
• When billing an exam and an injection on the same day, explain what made the exam separately billable, i.e., what is the significant and separately identifiable issue addressed?
• When unbundling two services, clarify the anatomical site, procedure, or clinical reason they are distinct.
It’s also helpful to establish internal processes for reviewing modifier use, especially for high-volume services. Conducting routine chart audits can catch issues early and prevent systemic problems. And when in doubt, don’t guess—consult payer policies or reach out to a retina-specific billing expert for guidance.
Modifiers are necessary tools in retina billing, but they can work against you if not supported by documentation. Take time to make sure every modifier you use tells a clear story that matches the medical record. Clean documentation not only protects your revenue, but it also protects your practice from compliance risk.
Need help reviewing your modifier use or documentation practices? Elizabeth Cifers specializes in retina coding, chart audits, and compliance education. If you’re unsure whether your modifier usage is audit-ready, let’s talk. A quick review now can save your practice from costly issues later. Schedule a free 30-minute consultation with Elizabeth here.
.png)
